Epstein Files
HomeEmailsFlightsTopicsSearchPeopleTimelineNewsNames

Epstein Files Explorer

Public court records from Giuffre v. Maxwell (SDNY 1:15-cv-07433). No editorial judgment implied.

AboutPeopleSearch
Home/Documents/Damage Control/US-v-Epstein-Doc32.pdf
Document33 pages
Law EnforcementLegal ProceedingsMedia & PRPersonal & LifestyleReal Estate & PropertiesScience & AcademiaVictim Statements

US-v-Epstein-Doc32.pdf

Source: us-v-epstein-docs

People Mentioned (32)
Jeffrey EpsteinJulie K. BrownPeople V. EpsteinDavid BoiesVersus RemandAnnie FarmerCourtney WildBrad EdwardsOffenses ResultingEpstein ContinueRoger PrzybylskiSex Offender Management AssessmentMiami HeraldMichael B. MukaseyElizabeth RosnerTina MooreLarry CelonaBruce GoldingHearing TranscriptJennifer Gaffney+12 more
Court Filing

US-v-Epstein-Doc32.pdf

33 pages
Page 1 of 33
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Government, - against - JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------x A. Background USDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRO NI CALLY FILED DOC#: --.......,,.,---~=~..-.- DATE FILED:---L.,._._~~----- 19 CR. 490 (RMB) DECISION & ORDER REMANDING DEFENDANT This ruling follows the Court's bail hearing held on July 15, 2019. The issue before the Court is whether the Defendant should continue to be remanded (incarcerated) pending trial or whether he should be granted release while the case proceeds. No matter the answer to this question and no matter what has been said in Court in analyzing the matter, this is a criminal case and the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is innocent of the Federal charges alleged against him now and until such time, if it comes, that a jury or the Court finds ( after fair and thorough consideration of the facts and the law) that he is guilty. See Transcript, dated July 8, 2019 ("7/8/19 Tr."), at 2-3; Transcript, dated July 15, 2019 ("7/15/19 Tr."), at 40. It should also be borne in mind that the Court has not (yet) been presented with a motion to dismiss the Indictment. This is a federal as opposed to a state case. We proceed under federal law and federal rules. The key federal statute that applies here is 18 U.S.C. § 1591 which sets forth the crime of sex trafficking with which Mr. Epstein is charged. Mr. Epstein is also charged with conspiring with others to commit sex trafficking under 18 U.S.C. § 371. With respect to the issue ofremand versus release, 18 U.S.C. § 3142 applies. It sets forth a presumption in favor of remand, an exception to the presumption in most cases which favors Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 1 of 33
1 / 33
Text extracted via OCR — may contain errors. Refer to original documents for authoritative information.

People (32)

Jeffrey Epstein10Julie K. Brown2People V. Epstein2David Boies2Versus Remand1Annie Farmer1Courtney Wild1Brad Edwards1Offenses Resulting1Epstein Continue1Roger Przybylski1Sex Offender Management Assessment1Miami Herald1Michael B. Mukasey1Elizabeth Rosner1Tina Moore1Larry Celona1Bruce Golding1Hearing Transcript1Jennifer Gaffney1N.Y. App1Reuven Fenton1Kate Sheehy1Chuck Weber1Mark Epstein1E.D. Penn1H. Defendant'S1A. Background1Richard M. Berman1B. Counsels'1David Mitchell1Hemy Pittman1