Epstein Files
HomeEmailsFlightsTopicsSearchPeopleTimelineNewsNames

Epstein Files Explorer

Public court records from Giuffre v. Maxwell (SDNY 1:15-cv-07433). No editorial judgment implied.

AboutPeopleSearch
Home/Documents/Financial Records/gov.uscourts.nysd.518649.81.0.pdf
Document4 pages
Media & PRPersonal & LifestyleScience & Academia

gov.uscourts.nysd.518649.81.0.pdf

Source: gov.uscourts.nysd.518649

People Mentioned (8)
Mj PubJeffrey EpsteinTom Winter’SJoy V. NorthEdwards HendersonAlex ZiccardiRichard BermanAlexander Ziccardi
Court Filing

gov.uscourts.nysd.518649.81.0.pdf

4 pages
Page 1 of 4
September 12, 2025 VIA EMAIL Honorable Richard Berman United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Judge Berman: NBC News respectfully submits this letter in support of Tom Winter’s request to unseal two names redacted from the Government’s July 19, 2019 letter arguing for Mr. Epstein’s pre- trial detention. I. Introduction NBC News’ discrete unsealing request involves a straightforward application of well- settled law. Simply put, the July 2019 Letter is a “judicial document” subject to a presumptive right of access under both the common law, see United States v. Graham, 257 F.3d 143, 153 (2d Cir. 2001), and the First Amendment, see In re New York Times Co., 828 F.2d 110, 114 (2d Cir. 1987). Because that presumptive right has not been overcome, the two redacted names in the Letter should be unsealed. II. Discussion A. The Common Law The Government acknowledges that NBC News has a presumptive common law right of access to the sealed names, see Opp. at 2, but glosses over the considerable weight that right must be afforded in this case. See United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1049 (2d Cir. 1995) (Amodeo II) (once a presumptive right of access is established, courts must determine the “weight to be given the presumption”). The Second Circuit has held that the presumptive right of access “is at its apogee when asserted with respect to documents relating to matters that directly affect an adjudication.” Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133, 140 (2d Cir. 2004). Because the July 2019 Letter undoubtedly relates to matters that directly affected an adjudication—namely, the decision of whether to grant Mr. Epstein bail—the two redacted names in that letter “should not remain under seal absent the most compelling reasons.” Id. (quoting Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 893 (2d Cir. 1982)). Moreover, the burden falls squarely on the Government to justify keeping the names a secret. See Amodeo II, 71 F.3d at 1047. MEMO ENDORSED See page 4. Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 81 Filed 09/15/25 Page 1 of 4
1 / 4
Text extracted via OCR — may contain errors. Refer to original documents for authoritative information.

People (8)

Mj Pub2Jeffrey Epstein1Tom Winter’S1Joy V. North1Edwards Henderson1Alex Ziccardi1Richard Berman1Alexander Ziccardi1