Epstein Files
HomeEmailsFlightsTopicsSearchPeopleTimelineNewsNames

Epstein Files Explorer

Public court records from Giuffre v. Maxwell (SDNY 1:15-cv-07433). No editorial judgment implied.

AboutPeopleSearch
Home/Documents/Damage Control/gov.uscourts.nysd.518649.79.0.pdf
Document3 pages
Law EnforcementLegal ProceedingsMedia & PRPersonal & LifestyleScience & Academia

gov.uscourts.nysd.518649.79.0.pdf

Source: gov.uscourts.nysd.518649

People Mentioned (5)
Richard M. BermanJay ClaytonJeffrey EpsteinI. BackgroundSearch Warrant
Court Filing

gov.uscourts.nysd.518649.79.0.pdf

3 pages
Page 1 of 3
[Type text] September 5, 2025 BY ECF Honorable Richard M. Berman United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Judge Berman: The Government respectfully submits this letter pursuant to the Court’s order, dated August 26, 2025 (the “Order”), and in opposition to the motion filed by NBC News on August 13, 2025 (the “Motion”). (Dkt. 78). For the reasons set forth below, as well as those set forth in the Government’s prior memoranda, the Government submits that the Motion should be denied. I. Background The Motion seeks to unseal the names of two individuals referenced in a letter filed by the Government on July 16, 2019 (the “July 2019 Letter” or Dkt. 23). The Government will refer to the individual referenced on the first page of the July 2019 Letter in the paragraph beginning “First” as “Individual-1” and the individual referenced on the same page in the paragraph beginning “Second” as “Individual-2.” (See Dkt. 23 at 1). Pursuant to the Order, on August 26, 2025, the Government notified Individual-1 and Individual-2 of the Motion and the Order. On August 29, 2025, the Government received a letter from counsel for Individual-1. The letter, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, expressed Individual-1’s opposition to the Motion. On September 5, 2025, the Government received an email from counsel for Individual-2. The email, which is attached as Exhibit B, expressed Individual-2’s opposition to the Motion.1 1 Because Exhibits A and B both contain personal identifying information for Individual-1 or Individual-2 and describe certain matters that are highly personal and sensitive, the Government respectfully submits that sealing of both exhibits is appropriate. See, e.g., United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1051 (2d Cir. 1995) (The “privacy interests of innocent third parties” should “weigh The Jacob K. Javits Federal Building 26 Federal Plaza, 37th Floor New York, New York 10278 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 79 Filed 09/05/25 Page 1 of 3
1 / 3
Text extracted via OCR — may contain errors. Refer to original documents for authoritative information.

People (5)

Richard M. Berman3Jay Clayton2Jeffrey Epstein1I. Background1Search Warrant1