Page 1 of 2
From: '
(USANYS)"
To: "
USANYS)"
>, "
(USANYS)"
Cc: "I
(USANYS) [Contractor]"
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Ghislaine Maxwell query
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 16:14:37 +0000
Thanks - we're checking now...
From:
(USANYS)
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2021 11:10 AM
To:
(USANYS)
Cc
(USANYS) [Contractor]
Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Ghislaine Maxwell query
Importance: High
URGENT: Please see below.
From: •USANYS)
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2021 11:09 AM
To: Josie Ensor
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Ghislaine Maxwell query
>
(USANYS) cS)
I appreciate you informing me, please let me check to see if that is indeed correct. And please do not publish any names
that may have inadvertently been left unredacted. I will get back to you. Thanks.
From: Josie Ensor
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 202111:00 AM
To:
(USANYS)
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Ghislaine Maxwell query
Dear
I hope you are well. I'm writing from the British Telegraph newspaper. I just had one question in the case of Ghislaine
Maxwell.
The judge has allowed the witnesses and victims to remain anonymous through the trial, should they so choose.
I noticed in a recent filing that the defence left the name of one of the government's proposed witnesses unredacted. As
this is now public, would we be allowed to report it?
For your information, it's contained in Document #453 of the United States vs. Maxwell.
Thank you very much for your time,
Josie Ensor
Josie Ensor
telegraphmediagroup
EFTA00040135