Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 607 Filed 02/24/22 Pagelof2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee |
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 2/24/22
United States of America,
_y_
20-CR-330 (AJN)
Ghislaine Maxwell,
ORDER
Defendant.
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:
The Court is in receipt of the Defendant’s proposed redactions revised in response to this
Court’s order. See Dkt. Nos. 605, 606.
The Court has reviewed the proposed redactions and concludes that they are in
accordance with its prior orders. See Dkt. Nos. 596, 605. The narrowly tailored redactions
further the important interests of helping ensure the integrity of any inquiry and maintaining
juror anonymity and privacy. As the Court explained in its February 11 Order, these interests
justify redaction of the questions the parties propose be asked at any hearing and specific factual
information developed by the parties that has not been publicly reported in the press and that the
parties propose be inquired about at any forthcoming hearing. Dkt. No. 596 at 4 (citing United
States v. McCoy et al., No. 14 Cr. 6181 (EAW), Dkt. No. 312 (text order) (W.D.N.Y. May 26,
2017); id. Dkt. No. 329 at 38-39; Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal., Riverside Cnty., 464
U.S. 501, 511-12 (1984)).
Accordingly, the parties ace ORDERED to docket the redacted briefs, accompanying
exhibits, and their January 13 letters, by February 25, 2022. The Court will docket Juror 50’s
motion.
DOJ-OGR- 00008976