Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Cy
HADDON
MORGAN
FOREMAN
December 15, 2021
VIA Email
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Document 555
Filed 12/18/21 Pagelof5
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80203
PH 303.831.7364
FX 303.832.2628
www.hmflaw.com
[email protected]
Re: — United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan,
I write in response to the government’s motion to preclude certain testimony by
Alexander Hamilton. Based on a defense Rule 26.2 disclosure, the government’s motion
identifies four categories of testimony it asks this Court to preclude:
(1) Testimony about K atc’ s a
(2) Testimony describing Kate as
(3) Testimony about Kate’s statements to Mr. Hamilton.
(4) Testimony about Mr. Hamilton’s J of Kate’s account of her alleged
abuse.
Gov. Letter, pp 8-10.
Ms. Maxwell provided Mr. Hamilton’s declaration to the government under Rule 26.2
because that is what the Rule requires. But just as the government does not intend to admit
evidence about every disclosure it makes, so too here.
DOJ-OGR- 00008431