Epstein Files
HomeEmailsFlightsTopicsSearchPeopleTimelineNewsNames

Epstein Files Explorer

Public court records from Giuffre v. Maxwell (SDNY 1:15-cv-07433). No editorial judgment implied.

AboutPeopleSearch
Home/Documents/354 [DOJ-OGR-00005246—DOJ-OGR-00005249]
Document4 pages

354 [DOJ-OGR-00005246—DOJ-OGR-00005249]

Source: doj-jeffrey-epstein-first-production-2025

People Mentioned (11)
Ghislaine MaxwellOrderAndrewsDupignyNathanArthur R. MillerJMFValenzuelaCharles Alan WrightR. EvidDkt
Court Filing

354 [DOJ-OGR-00005246—DOJ-OGR-00005249]

4 pages
Page 1 of 4
Caébast: 2020 CEP AEN Donurresntt aod Frida 10013201 Patpage afef 4 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building USDC SDNY One Saint Andrew’s Plaza DOCUMENT | New York, New York 10007 ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #; DATE FILED: 10/15/21 October 15, 2021 For the reasons stated in this letter, the Court finds that BY ECF there is good cause for any motion under Federal Rule of The Honorable Alison J. Nathan Evidence 412 to be filed no later than October 27, 2021. United States District Court Any response will be due November 1, 2021. Any hearing Southern District of New York will tentatively be scheduled for November 5, 2021. United States Courthouse Additional details will be provided if and when any motions 40 Foley Square are filed. SO ORDERED. New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Me \) A, 0/15/21 Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the Court’s Order dated October 14, 2021 (Dkt. No. 347) ordering the Government to respond to the defendant’s October 14, 2021 letter regarding the deadline for filing a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (Dkt. No. 345). In particular, the defendant wrote the Court to “confirm that November 15, 2021 is the deadline for [her] to file a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412.” (Dkt. No. 345). Federal Rule of Evidence 412(a)(1) provides that in a case involving allegations of sexual misconduct, “evidence offered to prove that a victim engaged in other sexual behavior” is coe inadmissible. The Rule “‘aims to safeguard the alleged victim against the invasion of privacy, potential embarrassment and sexual stereotyping that is associated with public disclosure of intimate sexual details.’” United States v. Rivera, 799 F.3d 180, 184 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting Fed. R. Evid. 412 advisory committee’s note). “The exclusion, however, is not absolute” as Rule 412(b) provides certain exceptions to this general prohibition in criminal cases. /d. Rule 412 provides that “[i]f a party intends to offer evidence under Rule 412(b),” the party must file a motion specifically describing the evidence and the purpose of the evidence, Fed. R. Evid. 412(c)(1)(A), DOJ-OGR-00005246
1 / 4
Text extracted via OCR — may contain errors. Refer to original documents for authoritative information.

People (11)

Ghislaine Maxwell1Order1Andrews1Dupigny1Nathan1Arthur R. Miller1JMF1Valenzuela1Charles Alan Wright1R. Evid1Dkt1