Epstein Files
HomeEmailsFlightsTopicsSearchPeopleTimelineNewsNames

Epstein Files Explorer

Public court records from Giuffre v. Maxwell (SDNY 1:15-cv-07433). No editorial judgment implied.

AboutPeopleSearch
Home/Documents/309 [DOJ-OGR-00004807—DOJ-OGR-00004809]
Document3 pages

309 [DOJ-OGR-00004807—DOJ-OGR-00004809]

Source: doj-jeffrey-epstein-first-production-2025

People Mentioned (16)
Ghislaine MaxwellBill CosbyOp-EdNathanDavid MarkusMarkusJeffrey Epstein’sFeds Detail Ghislaine Maxwell’s ‘Markus’s StatementsThe Op-EdHonorable Alison J. NathanBen FeuerherdCosbyStephen Rex BrownLocal Rulehttp://www .nydailynews.com
Court Filing

309 [DOJ-OGR-00004807—DOJ-OGR-00004809]

3 pages
Page 1 of 3
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 309 _ Filed 07/01/21 Page1of3 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 July 1, 2021 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter to bring to the Court’s attention an opinion piece (the “Op-Ed”’) published yesterday in the New York Daily News, which was authored by David Markus, Esq., who represents the defendant in connection with this case. Mr. Markus’s statements in the Op-Ed were in violation of Local Rule 23.1, which contains provisions relating to extrajudicial public statements by attorneys. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, the Government respectfully requests that the Court order Mr. Markus to comply with Local Rule 23.1. A. Mr. Markus’s Statements to the Media David Markus represents the defendant in connection with appellate matters in this case. In particular, Mr. Markus has handled the defendant’s bail appeals in this case, including an argument on her behalf in the Second Circuit. As the Court may recall, on April 14, 2021, Mr. Markus emailed Chambers requesting permission to bring electronics to the courthouse to attend the defendant’s arraignment on the superseding indictment. The Court informed Mr. Markus that he would need to file a notice of appearance before making such an application to the Court. Mr. Markus did not file a notice of appearance, but he attended the arraignment and spoke to members of the media thereafter.! ! See Stephen Rex Brown, Ghislaine Maxwell Makes First Court Appearance, N.Y. Daily News (Apr. 23, 2021), http://www .nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-ghislaine-maxwell-arraignment-202 10423- b3aza5eh7bddna7r247px2yb7e-story.html (quoting Mr. Markus, speaking outside the courthouse following the defendant’s arraignment and identifying him as “her attorney”). DOJ-OGR-00004807
1 / 3
Text extracted via OCR — may contain errors. Refer to original documents for authoritative information.

People (16)

Ghislaine Maxwell1Bill Cosby1Op-Ed1Nathan1David Markus1Markus1Jeffrey Epstein’s1Feds Detail Ghislaine Maxwell’s ‘1Markus’s Statements1The Op-Ed1Honorable Alison J. Nathan1Ben Feuerherd1Cosby1Stephen Rex Brown1Local Rule1http://www .nydailynews.com1