Epstein Files
HomeEmailsFlightsTopicsSearchPeopleTimelineNewsNames

Epstein Files Explorer

Public court records from Giuffre v. Maxwell (SDNY 1:15-cv-07433). No editorial judgment implied.

AboutPeopleSearch
Home/Documents/266 [DOJ-OGR-00004081—DOJ-OGR-00004083]
Document3 pages

266 [DOJ-OGR-00004081—DOJ-OGR-00004083]

Source: doj-jeffrey-epstein-first-production-2025

People Mentioned (5)
Ghislaine MaxwellFurmanGRANTS Maxwell’sJ. NATHANDkt
Court Filing

266 [DOJ-OGR-00004081—DOJ-OGR-00004083]

3 pages
Page 1 of 3
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 266 Filed 05/03/21 Page1of3 Uspe SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ce SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED? 5/3/21 United States of America, _y_ 20-CR-330 (AJN) Ghislaine Maxwell, ORDER Defendant. ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Last summer, the Court scheduled trial in this matter to commence on July 12, 2021. On March 29, 2021, three and a half months before trial, the Government filed an S2 Superseding Indictment. As a result of the late filing of the S2, counsel for Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell request a continuance of the trial date until either fall 2021 or January 2022.' The Government opposes any continuance, but requests that if one is granted it be until March of 2022. Having carefully considered the parties’ respective positions, the Court GRANTS Maxwell’s request for a short continuance until the fall of 2021 to allow the defense to prepare for the additional charges brought in the S2 indictment. The Court rejects Maxwell’s alternative request to continue the trial date until January of 2022 and the Government’s alternative proposal that the Court adjourn trial until March of 2022. The Court bases its decision on a number of factors. First, the filing of the S2 indictment has added a significant burden to the defense’s preparation for trial. The new indictment alleges ! The alternative request by Maxwell resulted from a conflict among lawyers involved in both this case and a criminal matter before Judge Furman, which is discussed in defense counsel’s letter. Dkt. No. 246 at 4. The Court has been informed that Judge Furman has adjourned the trial date with respect to two defendants. The Court presumes that this eliminates the September through December conflict for one of Maxwell’s defense counsel. It presumably does not eliminate the conflict for one of the AUSAs involved in both cases. Dkt. No. 235 at 10 n.5. DOJ-OGR-00004081
1 / 3
Text extracted via OCR — may contain errors. Refer to original documents for authoritative information.

People (5)

Ghislaine Maxwell1Furman1GRANTS Maxwell’s1J. NATHAN1Dkt1