Epstein Files
HomeEmailsFlightsTopicsSearchPeopleTimelineNewsNames

Epstein Files Explorer

Public court records from Giuffre v. Maxwell (SDNY 1:15-cv-07433). No editorial judgment implied.

AboutPeopleSearch
Home/Documents/062 [DOJ-OGR-00001784—DOJ-OGR-00001786]
Document3 pages

062 [DOJ-OGR-00001784—DOJ-OGR-00001786]

Source: doj-jeffrey-epstein-first-production-2025

People Mentioned (8)
Ghislaine MaxwellNathanAltoGangiUSDC SDNYAnderson v. Cryovac, Inc.Jeffrey EpsteinEpstein
Court Filing

062 [DOJ-OGR-00001784—DOJ-OGR-00001786]

3 pages
Page 1 of 3
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 62 Filed 10/08/20 Page 1 of 3 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney USDC SDNY Southern District of New York || POCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED The Silvio J. Mollo Building DOC #; One Saint Andrew’s Plaza DATE FILED: 10/7/20 New York, New York 10007 October 6, 2020 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan The Defendant shall file any United States District Court SO ORDERED. 10/7/20 | opposition to the Government's Southern District of New York A i 0 Alto request by October 14, = United States Courthouse , The Government's reply, if any, 40 Foley Square Alison J. Nathan, U.S.D J. |is due by October 20, 2020. New York, New York 10007 SO ORDERED. Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter to request that the Court grant the Government permission to delay disclosure to the defense of certain photographs of and documents regarding victims of sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. These materials relate to abuse that post- dated the time period charged in the Indictment, and the Government does not intend to offer them at trial. Although the Government intends to produce these materials to the defendant in advance of trial, premature disclosure of these materials could jeopardize the Government’s ongoing investigation and would reveal sensitive victim information months in advance of trial. For these reasons and as set forth below, the Government respectfully submits, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1), that good cause exists to delay disclosure of these items to defense counsel until eight weeks prior to trial.! The Government has conferred with defense counsel, who have indicated that they object to this request and intend to submit a letter in opposition. As the Court is aware, the superseding indictment in this case (the “Indictment”) charges the defendant in six counts. Count One of the Indictment charges Maxwell with conspiring with Epstein and others to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1 Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 provides for the production of discovery to a defendant, upon request, of certain materials, such as documents that are material to the preparation of the defense and documents the Government intends to use in its case-in-chief at trial. However, Rule 16(d)(1) also provides that: At any time the court may, for good cause, deny, restrict, or defer discovery or inspection, or grant other appropriate relief. The court may permit a party to show good cause by a written statement that the court will inspect ex parte. A finding of good cause “‘must be based on a particular factual demonstration of potential harm, not on conclusory statements.’”” United States v. Gangi, No. 97 Cr. 1215 (DC), 1998 WL 226196, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. May 4, 1998) (quoting Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., 805 F.2d 1, 8 (1st Cir. 1986)). DOJ-OGR-00001784
1 / 3
Text extracted via OCR — may contain errors. Refer to original documents for authoritative information.

People (8)

Ghislaine Maxwell1Nathan1Alto1Gangi1USDC SDNY1Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc.1Jeffrey Epstein1Epstein1