Epstein Files
HomeEmailsFlightsTopicsSearchPeopleTimelineNewsNames

Epstein Files Explorer

Public court records from Giuffre v. Maxwell (SDNY 1:15-cv-07433). No editorial judgment implied.

AboutPeopleSearch
Home/Documents/053 [DOJ-OGR-00001760—DOJ-OGR-00001762]
Document3 pages

053 [DOJ-OGR-00001760—DOJ-OGR-00001762]

Source: doj-jeffrey-epstein-first-production-2025

People Mentioned (18)
Ghislaine MaxwellBrown v. MaxwellMorganSarah NathanEpstein CaseJeffrey PagliucaKate SheeyNathanForemanMaxwellRequestJeffrey S. PagliucaJeffrey EpsteinEmailEpsteinjeftrey-epsteinAlan FeuerAndrew
Court Filing

053 [DOJ-OGR-00001760—DOJ-OGR-00001762]

3 pages
Page 1 of 3
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 53 Filed 09/08/20 Page 1 of 3 My Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.c Jeffrey Pagliuca HADDON tener Loctite 150 East 10th Avenue FOREMAN Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com [email protected] August 24, 2020 VIA EMAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Proposed Redactions to Request to Modify Protective Order (Under Seal) United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan, In accordance with this Court’s Order of August 18, 2020 (Doc. 44), Ms. Maxwell hereby respectfully submits under seal her proposed redactions to her Request to Modify Protective Order (“Request”), filed under seal on August 17, 2020. Ms. Maxwell also has filed her Reply under seal and contemporaneously submits her proposed redactions to that pleading.! Ms. Maxwell has no opposition to keeping under seal, and redacting from her Request and Reply, the contents, description and discussion of the sealed materials themselves; because the government has marked them Confidential, the Protective Order requires as much. See Doc. 36, y The government’s proposed redactions, however, go further and propose to redact NS. The covernment would have this Court redact lll on the premise that it would “risk jeopardizing the government’s investigation.” 1 To the extent this Court believes this letter also should be filed publicly, counsel also has indicated her proposed redactions to this letter. DOJ-OGR-00001760
1 / 3
Text extracted via OCR — may contain errors. Refer to original documents for authoritative information.

People (18)

Ghislaine Maxwell1Brown v. Maxwell1Morgan1Sarah Nathan1Epstein Case1Jeffrey Pagliuca1Kate Sheey1Nathan1Foreman1Maxwell1Request1Jeffrey S. Pagliuca1Jeffrey Epstein1Email1Epstein1jeftrey-epstein1Alan Feuer1Andrew1